It's not so much that I disagree with him/her. In fact, I would love it if we could do away with memory sharing. It's just that it seems a bit utopian (especially the argument that the hardware should do it for you).
My understanding is that he/she wanted to have the hardware handle concurrency automatically. Unfortunately, I don't see any way to get around having software dealing with concurrency.
My understanding is that he/she wanted to have the hardware handle concurrency automatically. Unfortunately, I don't see any way to get around having software dealing with concurrency.