Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Such information would purely be used for harassment.


This admin has no problems doxxing people for harassment, listing their personal home address on official social media posts: https://x.com/dhsgov/status/1912567112733753563?s=46. So why the double standard?


The court filing provides more information than just giving ammo to harassers so I do not see them as directly equivalent. I also do not agree with the premise that if one person does something bad it would justify someone else in doing so.


The publicly available filing does not include the home address of the individual. See https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryByCa... and search for case 0502SP019272021.

Plus - you’re telling me that highlighting an individual and posting their home address on an official government account is not “giving ammo to harassers”?


Not "just".


What other purpose did that unredacted post serve?


How does it feel to experience cognitive dissonance this hard?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: