Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> It's the tracking part. That's where the juice is.

how do you figure? everyone already has a perfect tracker carried around with them at all times, a cell phone. and i suppose, if someone is smart enough to not visit a thing with a phone, he'll be smart enough to not use a car, so... do you see what i mean? it still boils down to, "the technology is not really as good as it says it is." i mean i know that you say that it's not, it is. It is all about what it says on the tin.

That's enterprise sales. People have to stop making it about cerebral, academic political stuff. If municipalities understood that Flock is a waste of money, they wouldn't adopt it.



Law enforcement has a hard time negotiating with Google to get your location at all times. Oh Google knows it but they won't just send everyone's location all the time, only specific requests with or without a warrant. Same thing for Apple.


The carriers can provide almost as good location data through just doing fairly simple calculations on timings and signal strengths received by the cell towers, and their implicit knowledge about where those cell towers are located. Good keywords for further reading are (("4G" or "LTE") and "GMLC") or ("5G" and "LMF") and/or OTDOA.

While Google and Apple may be hesitant, what are your thoughts about AT&T or Verizon?


Why would they go to Google or Apple for GPS data when your mobile network provider will sell it openly to a third party who resells it to the cops?

https://www.aclu.org/news/privacy-technology/dhs-is-circumve...

Bonus, no amount of jailbreaking or trickery can get around the fact that if your baseband chip is connected to the network, they have your rough location.


It has apparently gotten easier:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2026/02/03/hom...

A nice “grab their data” button for the current administration.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: