> There was definitely a point where PCs left the Amiga in the dust
Yes but by that time you had other home computing platforms like the Acorn Archimedes, arguably the next evolutionary step in the home computing niche. x86 hardware would've been very expensive at the time and mostly used for business purposes, not in the home.
The Acorn Archimedes was never serious competition for Commodore in that space.
I remember - as an Amiga user - cheekily pitching software upgrades to Acorn to help address the massive shortcomings we saw in RiscOS compared to AmigaOS. Even ca. 1996, a couple of years after Commodore's device, we were still smug about how much better we saw the Amiga as being.
We were willing to accept the hardware wasn't bad, but the Amiga userbase never really considered the Archimedes in the same ballpark as an overall system.
I got an Acorn A3010 to replace my Amiga 2000. It was a massive improvement! Not for games as there weren't all that many but the more serious software was amazingly good.
Impression Publisher ran rings around every DTP package on the Amiga. It was an all around better machine, for those kind of tasks. I still miss the Draw program that was included in the ROM (!) of RiscOS.
But alas, the PC made it all history. And while I'm happy with my current hardware, it sure isn't as exiting as the older era...
I'm not surprised - the A3010 was 5 years newer. The more direct competitor for the A3010 would have been the Amiga 1200, but their specs meant they certainly targeted very different markets - "nobody" bought any of the "small" Amigas for DTP.
Yes but by that time you had other home computing platforms like the Acorn Archimedes, arguably the next evolutionary step in the home computing niche. x86 hardware would've been very expensive at the time and mostly used for business purposes, not in the home.