I doubt that, but AMD said that it is free to use in any AMD (Xilinx) FPGA.
Had it required to pay a fee, there would have been no interest in this announce, because there are free alternatives.
It can be assumed that this core is well optimized to use efficiently the resources of a Xilinx FPGA, which is likely to be its advantage over alternatives.
Had it required to pay a fee, there would have been no interest in this announce, because there are free alternatives.
It can be assumed that this core is well optimized to use efficiently the resources of a Xilinx FPGA, which is likely to be its advantage over alternatives.