And I try to convince my family about it, but just cannot get it through to them that "kindle the tablet" and "kindle the ebook reader" are entirely unrelated products. What a terrible bit of branding.
I thought it as well, but then I bought a Kobo (Aura One back then) and I'm super happy. And it is much more hackable: there a countless patches to the official firmware, plus installing koreader is a piece of cake.
I use my kindle all the time and I totally forget about charging it. Then suddenly it tells me it's low on battery and I remember "oh yeah, I've not charged this in like 3 months"
What other modern battery device has that many interactions/uses without needing near daily recharges? It's like magic
My smartwatch (or any similar transflective watch from the likes of Garmin or Amazfit for that matter) are similar. I got close to 90 days between charges once. Now I use it much more but still get many weeks between charges.
I will always take the opportunity to read without a backlight. It's a hugely noticeable difference on the eyes for me. I'm just glad I don't have to print out thousands of sheets of paper just to read documents comfortably any more.
I was reading on a normal android tablet. When I saw a sale on a kids bundle for 99 bux, decided to pull the trigger. Been my night time reader for months when going to sleep. It's amazing how easy on the eyes it is. I just read until I start to nod off.
Not OP, but it's both not as capable as LCD, and a lot of people who like reading seem to be part of the physical book sniffer religion. You know, the "I NEED A REAL BOOK." people. Given they're the main demographic aimed at by e-book readers, and a lot of them seem to hate even just the idea of reading on any screen, I can see why people would think the technology would quickly go away.
Isn't that like saying that iTunes MP3 purchasers are part of the 'vinyl obssessive' crowd? Someone who purchases a $14.99 book on a Kindle is doing so because they aren't going to spend $27.99 on the hardcover.
I wouldn't count vinyl as a real alternative to mp3's. mp3's are more a replacement for portable stuff : cd's and cassettes. And I never heard anybody but the most hipsters defend those.
It's more like comparing vinyl to first gen non-portable cd players. I wasn't there at the time, but I imagine it was probably not obvious then either that cd players were there to stay.