> The interesting thing about your comment is that you view password hashing as needing more security but git commit hashes to be less of an issue.
I do? I should have been more clear that I think this is another case which very much depends on the other considerations I addressed and probably many more.
> And "is it possible?" is by definition always "yes".
You’re not the only person to say so, and… I know. I left the possibility open in my response mainly because I wanted to focus on the other considerations without dismissing the parent comment. Even if the answer was less definitive I believe considering level and degree of risk should be a bigger factor in these conversations than what’s theoretically possible.
I do? I should have been more clear that I think this is another case which very much depends on the other considerations I addressed and probably many more.
> And "is it possible?" is by definition always "yes".
You’re not the only person to say so, and… I know. I left the possibility open in my response mainly because I wanted to focus on the other considerations without dismissing the parent comment. Even if the answer was less definitive I believe considering level and degree of risk should be a bigger factor in these conversations than what’s theoretically possible.