Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This can't be permanent. I bet this is to keep the markets happy in the short term while this gets absorbed, and then Kotick will "retire" at some point in the next year.


I'd buy shares right now if they had gotten rid of Kotick.


Even though it would cost an additional $275 ish million?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: