Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's not. It sets ACLs so that the user that owns the process may read the coredump, but typical ls doesn't show that.


ls -l will note the presence of ACLs with a "+" next to the permissions. I typically `ls -l` or just have that aliased to ll if it isn't already… (but YMMV)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: