So she's doing her job and getting paid well for it?

How fantastic. That means from age 18 we can allow men on social media!

Nobody denies all the effects of social media are negative. After all, if they were, nobody would use them. So there are benefits to it.

It also isn't news, really. The Dutch 'MIND Hulplijn' [1] in their former carnation 'Stichting Korrelatie' had a pilot with an online forum where people with mental issues could connect with each other. It eventually decided to close the forum because of users talking each other down in regard to the subject of suicide (edit: and automutilation). However, the effect of a support group was also clearly there which was also a reason why they were reluctant to close it down.

What I'd like to know is how the effect would be compared to a forum or real-life support group. Because comparing social media with 'no help' or 'loneliness' obviously isn't fair.

[1] https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIND_Hulplijn

No, in both genders. You have to click on the link to the paper [0]:

>Gender was approximately equal, with 50.8% being female.

If anything, the data is more accurate for females, since there are 1.6pp more females.

[0]: https://www.mdpi.com/3679792

What cream was it? Curious how much it costs where I live / travel.

Eucrisa - https://www.goodrx.com/eucrisa?label_override=eucrisa&form=t...

Update:

> GPT-5.2 and GPT-5.2-Codex are now 40% faster.

> We have optimized our inference stack for all API customers.

> Same model. Same weights. Lower latency.

> https://x.com/OpenAIDevs/status/2018838297221726482

Same model? Then why is the cutoff date on 5.2 that of Codex, i.e. 2024?

That's a possible hypothesis, but qualitatively the model seems to be so much less capable than it was even 4 hours ago.

And I'm talking about GPT 5.2 High (non-codex), which is the best trade-off model for capability vs. speed.

It's like talking to a senior programmer who all of a sudden experienced a traumatic injury. Noticeable.

Interesting. For what it is worth, I use Claude Opus at the moment and I am generally impressed.

HN is hostile to most web dev. About 10% of web dev is acceptable, and the rest is bad for one reason or another.

> Please don't complain that a submission is inappropriate. If a story is spam or off-topic, flag it. Don't feed egregious comments by replying; flag them instead. If you flag, please don't also comment that you did.

> Please don't post comments saying that HN is turning into Reddit. It's a semi-noob illusion, as old as the hills.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

This was irony, I don't care whether this submission is in the listing.

> it was a relatively small World War I shell, measuring about 20 centimeters long and just over three centimeters in diameter

Is this a felony?

Since there are people from all countries here, the answer to your question depends a lot on who you ask. I don't think even the specific word you used is relevant in all parts of the world.

Is it a felony where you live?

That term doesn't exist in the legal language where I live. And I don't know your term well enough to know what it maps to in our law.

In the United States, there's felonies and misdemeanors. Felonies are a big deal, and misdemeanors are a small deal.

Felonies carry sentences over a year, and time is served in state or federal prison, not in a local jailhouse.

No, it was self defense.

You’re both correct, 100%. Seriously.

Yeah, it’s simply pissing me off that no person noticed the only abnormal behaviour here is the dude labelling the whole category of human beings as “awful” without trying to understand their motives. Selfish and entitled on a boss level.

Are those who smoke on a top floor balcony also awful? Are those who smoke on a balcony of a multi-storey building they live alone in also awful people?